Skip to Content


Electability refers to a political candidate’s perceived ability to win an election, as assessed by voters, party insiders, political pundits, and the media.

It encapsulates a myriad of factors including personal attributes, political positioning, and the prevailing political environment.

As pollster Patrick Murray told NBC News: “Electability is in the eye of the beholder. Voters are not very good at predicting electability… It really is ill-informed, but we know that it’s not facts —but perception — that drive voter behavior.”

More from the Los Angeles Times: “So any discussion of electability must come with caveats and qualifications. It’s important not to define the concept too narrowly, or to assume that the most electable Democrat will be the one who looks or sounds most like our previous presidents. The candidates have to prove over the coming months in a variety of settings how viable or non-viable they will be.”

Components of Electability

Electability is not a singular or static concept but a complex amalgamation of different elements:

  • Personal Attributes: These include a candidate’s charisma, credibility, relatability, and trustworthiness. A candidate deemed “electable” usually has the ability to connect with voters on an emotional and intellectual level.
  • Positioning: The candidate’s ideology and policy stances need to align with the values and interests of the electorate. An electable candidate often manages to strike a balance between the core principles of their base and the broader, more moderate voters.
  • Experience: A track record of leadership, legislative accomplishments, or other relevant experiences contributes to a candidate’s electability.
  • Public Perception: The way a candidate is portrayed in the media and perceived by the public plays a significant role in their electability. This involves both traditional media and social media engagement.
  • Viability in Key Demographics: Electability includes the candidate’s ability to resonate with different demographic groups, such as age, gender, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status
  • Campaign Resources: A well-funded campaign with a robust organizational structure enhances a candidate’s electability.

For party activists and primary voters, electability may sometimes clash with ideological purity.

A candidate who aligns perfectly with a party’s core principles may not be perceived as electable in a general election, where broader appeal is often necessary. This is sometimes called the “electability trap.”

In primary elections, the concept becomes highly salient as voters and party elites weigh the desire to nominate a candidate who resonates with their values against the need to select a candidate who can win the general election.

However, it’s important to state that electability is inherently subjective.

For instance, assumptions about a candidate may be based on their gender, race, or other characteristics unrelated to their qualifications or political positions.

The definition of electability can also shift over time and across different political landscapes.

What is considered electable in one election cycle may not hold in another, reflecting changes in public opinion, political polarization, or societal norms.

Use of “Electability” in a sentence

  • Despite his fervent base and passionate speeches, the candidate’s electability was questioned by many party insiders who feared his radical stances would alienate moderate voters in the general election.
  • The focus on electability during the primary led to intense debates within the party, with some arguing for a candidate who represented the core values of the party, while others pushed for a more centrist figure with broader appeal.
  • Political pundits often analyze electability through polling data, historical trends, and voter demographics, yet the unpredictable nature of modern campaigns means that electability remains a challenging concept to quantify precisely.