The “professional left” consists of left-leaning political pundits, paid activists, and the heads of progressive institutions.
Critics might use the term to highlight a perceived disconnect between such professional activists and grassroots movements.
Origin of “Professional Left”
The term “professional left” was coined by White House press secretary Robert Gibbs in an interview with The Hill when he dismissed the concerns of liberals frustrated with President Obama:
I hear these people saying he’s like George Bush. Those people ought to be drug tested. I mean, it’s crazy. They will be satisfied when we have Canadian healthcare and we’ve eliminated the Pentagon. That’s not reality.
The Wall Street Journal reported that Gibbs later clarified he was primarily referring to the people “who chatter on cable TV news.”
Critics argue that the “professional left” can be disconnected from the grassroots and everyday concerns of ordinary citizens.
They are sometimes seen as being more interested in political maneuvering and maintaining their own influence than in advancing the broader goals of social justice and equality.
It’s important to note that the term is not universally accepted or used, and its meaning can vary depending on the context.
Some may use it to highlight the expertise and influence of these professionals, while others may use it as a critique of their perceived detachment from the grassroots.
Use of “Professional Left” in a sentence
- Critics argue that the professional left, with their focus on policy details and legislative strategy, often overlooks the immediate needs and concerns of the grassroots supporters they claim to represent.
- The professional left played a crucial role in shaping the progressive policy agenda, leveraging their extensive networks and expertise to influence public opinion and legislative outcomes.
- While the professional left’s knowledge and experience can be invaluable in navigating complex political landscapes, their perceived detachment from everyday citizens can sometimes lead to a disconnect between policy proposals and the realities of those they aim to help.